Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 10(10): e0140374, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26489088

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to evaluate, in a ligature-induced peri-implantitis model, the efficacy of three antimicrobial glassy coatings in the prevention of biofilm formation, intrasulcular bacterial growth and the resulting peri-implant bone loss. METHODS: Mandibular premolars were bilaterally extracted from five beagle dogs. Four dental implants were inserted on each hemiarch. Eight weeks after, one control zirconia abutment and three with different bactericidal coatings (G1n-Ag, ZnO35, G3) were connected. After a plaque control period, bacterial accumulation was allowed and biofilm formation on abutments was observed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Peri-implantitis was induced by cotton ligatures. Microbial samples and peri-implant crestal bone levels of all implant sites were obtained before, during and after the breakdown period. RESULTS: During experimental induce peri-implantitis: colony forming units counts from intrasulcular microbial samples at implants with G1n-Ag coated abutment remained close to the basal inoculum; G3 and ZnO35 coatings showed similar low counts; and anaerobic bacterias counts at control abutments exhibited a logarithmic increase by more than 2. Bone loss during passive breakdown period was no statistically significant. Additional bone loss occurred during ligature-induce breakdown: 0.71 (SD 0.48) at G3 coating, 0.57 (SD 0.36) at ZnO35 coating, 0.74 (SD 0.47) at G1n-Ag coating, and 1.29 (SD 0.45) at control abutments; and statistically significant differences (p<0.001) were found. The lowest bone loss at the end of the experiment was exhibited by implants dressing G3 coated abutments (mean 2.1; SD 0.42). SIGNIFICANCE: Antimicrobial glassy coatings could be a useful tool to ward off, diminish or delay peri-implantitis progression.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar/prevenção & controle , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Biofilmes/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Peri-Implantite/prevenção & controle , Animais , Bactérias/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Dente Pré-Molar/cirurgia , Biofilmes/efeitos dos fármacos , Compostos de Cálcio/farmacologia , Dente Suporte/microbiologia , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/efeitos adversos , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Placa Dentária/microbiologia , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Cães , Vidro/química , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Modelos Animais , Osseointegração , Óxidos/farmacologia , Prata/farmacologia , Hidróxido de Sódio/farmacologia , Propriedades de Superfície , Leveduras/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Óxido de Zinco/análogos & derivados , Óxido de Zinco/farmacologia
2.
PLoS One ; 7(12): e52861, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23285206

RESUMO

The objective of the present study is to evaluate bone loss at implant abutments coated with a soda-lime glass containing silver nanoparticles subjected to experimental peri-implantitis. Five beagle dogs were used in the experiments, 3 implants were installed in each quadrant of the mandibles. Glass/n-Ag coted abutments were connected to implant platform. Cotton floss ligatures were placed in a submarginal position around the abutment necks and the animals were subject to a diet which allowed plaque accumulation, and after 15 weeks the dogs were sacrificed. Radiographs of all implant sites were obtained at the beginning and at the end of the experimentally induced peri-implantitis. The radiographic examination indicated that significant amounts of additional bone loss occurred in implants without biocide coating, considering both absolute and relative values of bone loss. Percentages of additional bone loss observed in implants dressed with a biocide coated abutment were about 3 times lower (p<0.006 distal aspect; and p<0.031 at mesial aspect) than the control ones. Within the limits of the present study it seems promising the use of soda-lime glass/nAg coatings on abutments to prevent peri-implant diseases.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Dente Suporte , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Desinfetantes/administração & dosagem , Doenças Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagem , Peri-Implantite/diagnóstico por imagem , Titânio , Algoritmos , Perda do Osso Alveolar/etiologia , Animais , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/efeitos adversos , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/farmacologia , Dente Suporte/efeitos adversos , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/efeitos adversos , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/microbiologia , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Cães , Doenças Maxilares/etiologia , Peri-Implantite/complicações , Peri-Implantite/prevenção & controle , Radiografia , Propriedades de Superfície , Titânio/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...